My main profession in the USMC was anti-tank gunner, and as part of our training we received extensive instruction in what effects different impacts have on different kinds of armor. The best way to do this would be using dirt. The best way to stop a modern tank round is not to stop it cold, but to absorb its impact. The main problem with stone is that it tends to splinter and cause really bad spalling. No nuclear shells, no self-propelled artillery or rocket launchers. The criteria would be that even after, let us say, 10 main gun hits it remains mostly intact - maybe some dents and scratches or mild holes, but nothing that makes it structurally unsound.įor tanks I would consider "normal" main battle tanks as used in modern armies - you can use any of those in service of any world army, using any of the ammo types used in more or less "normal" combat situations - let's say any (or similar) ammo as used in Persian Gulf war. ![]() I am wondering about the practical limit for damaging a solid stone structure - basically, large or small stones and mortar - think medieval walls - as thick as you want. ![]() ![]() From In what war would one modern military vehicle make a difference? question I presume a tank could decimate something like an ordinary medieval castle as have survived to this day.īut at some point even a modern tank's main gun should not be enough (otherwise, why not just level a mountain, while you're at it, rather than driving around it).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |